Tag: homeless

By on

Lucian Truscott IV proposes the most bizarre reason yet for the Democrats loss in last year’s election. His idea is that too many of the potential Democratic voters were high on legal marijuana. Yes. You heard it right. As a legal marijuana smoker, I can only reply one way. For Christ’s fucking sake, man, you are scraping the bottom of the barrel for that one.

His opinion, which he himself concedes is based in speculation and no data whatsoever, sees millions of potential voters emotionally deadened to the prospect of an authoritarian takeover of their government just failed to vote. They just weren’t scared enough to vote because they were floating on feel good marijuana.

This isn’t even worth consideration — not even worth a maybe and lets look into this further. This is bullshit with a capital B. It is just a way to avoid looking at the bigger problem that large swaths of the Democratic Party establishment are out of touch with regular voters. Hell, they are out of touch with their own voters.

I hang with a primarily liberal Democratic group and I don’t know anyone who cares about proper pronoun use or support sex change operations for children. Republicans managed to attach these really suspect ideas onto the Democratic brand. The Democratic Establishment did relatively little to change this perception. Instead of Hell no this isn’t what we are about, they downplayed the importance of the issues saying that the vast majority of voters don’t care about these issues as they only affect a small number of Americans. Not talking about an issue that is unpopular to the general population is a terrible response to the question. It is as good as admitting that these issues were indeed important to the Democratic Party but are too toxic to talk about.

If people in my liberal circles aren’t particularly worried about proper pronouns and child sex change operations, then I am pretty certain that people who have less liberal inclinations are baffled. This awkward non-response left a lot of people asking why are we talking about transexuals in the schools in the first place. Parents would much prefer children learning what a pronoun is before learning which is their child’s preferred pronoun. These aren’t issues that will capture the imaginations of mainstream voters.

Say like the homeless overrunning the streets of our cities. I happen to agree that this is a bigger problem and isn’t easily solved. It also sounds like an excuse to do absolutely nothing. Well, then, if you can’t do anything to resolve the problem, then why wouldn’t people opt for someone, no matter how awful he is, who seems willing to take on the problem. Liberal government has to perform with the resources it has and perform well. Right now the perception is that government is failing to deal with the homeless problem and, I am afraid, this perception is right.

A lot of this caution is due to concern about the rights of homeless people. Middle class people vote, the homeless do not. Political parties have to deal with reality in order to get elected. This means addressing the concerns of this larger electorate is an important step in winning elections. When people have homeless people camping out on their streets and government says we are unable to help you because the homeless have rights, well what the hell can you do then? Shrugging your shoulders in despair is hardly a motivating call to action.

In the meantime, by all means, go after the non-voting marijuana smokers if you must. But, I think a better use of our resources would be to learn how to deliver better government services to the people who vote. All I know is that after reading all Truscott’s bullshit, I need to smoke me a joint.

By on

The Supreme Court determined that it was legal to ban people from sleeping on city streets. This will somehow cause the homeless problem to go away, at least if they are sleeping. I am not sure what happens to them when they are awake. This just moves them along during the night time hours. It reminds me of something the city of Coronado used to do with its homeless. They gave the homeless a bus ticket to San Diego. Problem solved. Until of course a few radio personalities found out about it. They, then, gave the homeless bus tickets to Coronado.

This law is a marketing ploy to give the illusion of action. The public sees the cops taking away the sleeping homeless and think something is being done. But where are they going? What’s to stop them from sleeping outside the city limits and coming back the next day? What happens to repeat offenders? Do they go to jail for illegal sleeping? Then the homeless will have both a home and plenty of food all on the tax payer dime.

This is a waste of time for everyone involved. More work for the cops and the courts. More hassles for the homeless. The public will only have temporary relief from the homeless on their streets. Drug addiction and mental illness will still drive people out into the streets because these are difficult problems that require a bit more thinking, more energy, more money and more time. The public is being tricked into believing something is happening when nothing at all is really changing. But it is a very good trick.

By on

Johnny McEntee, ex-Trump assistant, likes to give fake money to the homeless so that they get arrested later when they try to use the counterfeit cash. My first thought was what an asshole which others apparently conveyed to him because he later added that it’s just a joke. Ha Ha Ha. How clever, right? Why is tricking poor people into distributing phony money so they wind up in prison for passing phony money so funny?

This is junior high school bully humor. Picking on the weird kid, give him a false sense of security and then pulling the rug out from under him. Maybe the homeless person has some root problem like drug addiction or mental illness that helped paved the way for them to end up on the streets. Maybe they had a run of bad luck (losing their job, couldn’t afford their house payments) that put them there. None of it is particularly funny though.

It reveals a lack of compassion that is disturbing. He even has the sense that he is crossed some line because he added just joking to the link. So he knows how it looks and yet instead of removing the offending link, he tells us he is joking, so he can let us in on the joke which means he still thinks it is funny. All he needs to do is point out that it is supposed to be funny and we will get it. Do you get it? I certainly hope so.

By on 4 Comments

Conservative columnist Heather MacDonald recently bemoaned the mentally ill people roaming the streets of our city. She describes the failure of civil institutions to protect regular people from these people. Texas Republican Governor Abbott thinks that better mental health care is the solution to mass casualty shootings plaguing his state. Mental Health is the solution to these twin social ills the country is facing.

Better Mental Health certainly would help. The problem is what exactly are the solutions these Mental Health critics offering to meet these problems. Where will these mentally ill people be housed? Who will pay for their housing and medical care? How will their legal rights be protected? How do we identify the mentally ill? What will be the standard for involuntary institutionalization? These all call for the expansion of government oversight and infrastructure. They also all cost money.

How does this happen given the Conservative and Republican distaste for government regulation and taxes? Would they support an increase in taxes to insure that the mentally ill had suitable housing and healthcare? Would they support the psychological testing of gun buyers to determine if they have violent psychological problems? If protecting citizens is the goal, how much money are they willing to spend to achieve this goal? How do they propose protecting citizens from the criminally insane without a massive expansion of mental health and judicial systems? Prisons are not mental health clinics, putting the criminally insane into prisons

It is all well and good to point the finger at the mental health crisis but what are the mental health solutions? There are a lot of unanswered questions. Until these critics provide proposals to address these questions, their criticism is just loud noise to distract from the emptiness of their vision. They have absolutely nothing to offer that will solve these problems.

By on

A lot of people in California are talking about the homeless. The homeless population is growing. The homeless used to be invisible but now are visible to an uncomfortable degree. Because of this, it is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore them. They are annoying. They beg for money. They go through trashcans sometimes not even extending the courtesy of waiting for you to return to your home. They defecate on the streets. Their camps occupy block after block of city streets. They sometimes are angry. They are sometimes crazy. They are scary. They are making the California urban experience pretty unpleasant.

Californians are asking what can we do about the homeless? When anyone is ever pressed for a solution, though, they shrug their shoulders. There is no solution. Which isn’t exactly true. There are no cheap solutions.

Every solution, no matter where it comes from (Right, Left, Center), has the same glaring flaw. Money.

Some people want to jail them. Except this means we will need more police, more judges, more prisons. Plus there is the irony, particularly for people who don’t like spending money on the poor, that the tax payer ends up both housing the homeless and feeding them. No matter, it is a moot point. Despite the great satisfaction many people would have in rounding up the homeless and sending them to prison, there is no money for it.

Some people want to take care of the homeless which seems like the most humane way to handle them but, of course, housing costs money. Money for property buildings, money for property managers, money to maintain buildings. The rents will probably be supplemented by the government. All of this means money.

Some people want to address the psychiatric and/or drug problems that some of the homeless have. This requires hospitals, doctors, nurses, and social workers, all of which costs money.

You can see the problem here. It is money. Few people want to spend money on the homeless. I learned this first hand once when I had a conversation with a neighbor about the hepatitis epidemic which began in the homeless population. It had spilled over into the general population, so the city was trying to take action to stop the spread. My neighbor discovered a homeless man defecating on a sidewalk in our neighborhood. After filling me in on how he gave that particular piece of vermin a piece of his mind, he went on to fulminate about the city proposing a new tax that would provide more public restrooms for the homeless. He couldn’t understand why he should have to pay more taxes so the homeless would have restrooms. I thought I had a reasonable argument for him. I ventured, well, if there were more public toilets maybe he wouldn’t have to worry about homeless people defecating on the sidewalk. I was wrong. He would rather watch the neighborhood himself and chase away any offenders when necessary than pay more taxes. Mind you this was during a hepatitis epidemic. The city was washing down the streets with clorox.

So, the real problem here is we don’t have a way of raising the money that can address the needs of our homeless population. They are comparatively small group of citizens, don’t vote and seem completely overwhelmed by their circumstances to organize themselves into an effective political unit. This means that it is unlikely that any money is going to be funneled in their direction. In the meantime, we are left with the homeless.