The people who get into an uproar about things, have a new thing to get into an uproar about. Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein pal and sex trafficker, was transferred to a cushier section of her prison. The concern here is she getting special treatment because she is well-connected and rich. This is probably true and is concerning. Why should rich prisoners get better digs than their poorer cell mates? The story is she is being rewarded for good behavior. Nice. I am assuming that the less heeled inmates have this same opportunity.

Although using her influence to get a leg up is troubling, it isn’t as troubling as the indifference to her fellow inmates safety. The Daily Mail describes her new environment as being similar to what Maxwell “experienced when she attended boarding school as a young girl,” This is much better than her present home which is called the “Snake Pit” because inmates in the Snake Pit have a greater risk of experiencing violence. I get that this is the honor section of the prison and that inmates lucky enough to get in have a bit more freedom and possibly comforts. But this is altogether a different problem here. Personal safety should be about the same throughout the prison. Yes, some prisoners will experience violence, it is inevitable. But, come on, anything called the Snake Pit must have an incredible level of violence. This is inherently unfair to the poor and unconnected.

Defenders of the system will say that it is behavior, and only behavior, that matters. Money or influence has nothing to do with it. I don’t think anyone believes that, but OK a perception of fairness has to be presented so the public will think that some effort was made to be fair. It is difficult to create fair processes when some people come from money. Money always gives people an advantage. These people can have lawyers working for them to get better deals, filling out the proper paper work, and do everything to make sure that their client is getting the best deal possible. Being raised in British boarding schools gives Maxwell insight into the type of behavior that is rewarded and the behavior that is punished. She knows how the game is played and has the resources to play it.

Honestly, if personal safety wasn’t involved, I could live with the perks of the honor system and the questionable selection process that unfairly gives the richer inmate a better chance of rewards than the poorer inmate. It is unfair and wrong but you got to choose your battles and, right now, nobody’s much interested in taking the money advantage away from the rich. But there is a difference between a nicer living accommodation and personal safety. Why should one sexual trafficker get a better chance of surviving prison than another sexual trafficker?

This points to a bigger problem than the rich and powerful getting better treatment. Being beat up or raped or killed is not a part of a person’s sentence nor should it be. But it seems to be largely accepted that violence exists in prisons and that if you wind up in one, you are at risk of experiencing it and, as a society, we are largely OK with that. Indeed, the threat of prison rape for men is seen as a possible determent for young men who might be thinking of straying from the straight and narrow. The general public isn’t particularly interested in stopping it and there is some general benefit seen from the threat of it and, really, who wants to pay additional tax money so that prison inmates are safer. We live in a country where Governors turn down federal money to feed poor school children because they don’t believe in the Welfare State. If poor children can’t get money, you can be sure that it is hopeless for prisoners.

In the meantime, congratulations to Maxwell who is now a little safer from violence. She might be a person who could shed some light on this problem and do some good with the rest of her life. But, somehow, I don’t see that happening.